Web Survey Bibliography
The main objective of the presentation is to answer the question significant for social survey research why some people participate in a scientific panel survey while others refuse to participate. The so
‐called unit‐nonresponse, i.e. the systematic denial of a person to participate in a scientific survey, might be an important problem in social research, since it can be a crucial source of selective sampling. Meta‐analysis of existing literature on unitnonresponse provide empirical evidence that the empirical analysis of the reasons of unitnonresponse are not driven by testing the theories explaining the individuals’ refuse in participating at a survey but it is based on so‐called ‘variable sociology’. That WAPOR Annual Conference 2009 4 ‐participants have been used to deduce the main reasons for individuals’ unit‐nonresponse in a speculative way. Social decision‐making mechanisms of the respondent’s decisions with some explanation power working behind these distributions thus remain undetected. To answer the central research question, the causes for the participation or non‐participation in surveys have to be uncovered. ‐nonresponse as a result of an individual decision of the respondents. In traditional panel surveys, there is a lack of essential variables explaining the individuals’ participation behaviour; therefore it is necessary to conduct these information in a special research design. ‐mail addresses in order to send the results to them. However, these email addresses has been used to ask the former respondents to participate in an online survey on drug use twice. The actual participation is explained by the previously collected theoretical constructs. The collected data provide following results: At the beginning of a panel survey, considerations of costs (such as fear of data misuse) as well as the factor of the respondent’s currently available time have influences the respondents participation decision. Respondents will take part at the second wave of a panel survey more likely if only a few questions were stressful in the initial wave and, moreover, if the survey topic is of interest for them. These results support the theory of rational action in order to explain unit‐nonresponse. As part of this study on the participation behavior in social science surveys, an experiment was carried out to explore for a mailed questionnaire empirically, whether non‐monetary incentives increases the cooperation of the respondents in an classroom survey and reduces their fear of costs. Therefore, two experiments were carried out. ‐monetary incentives (one 50g Toblerone) had no influence on the cooperation of the respondents, a promised non‐monetary incentive (lottery) leads to the opposite effect. It appeared to be successful for the respondents cooperation, although could not reduce the respondents fear of costs.
means that the distributions of demographic variables of participants and non
One model of participation behavior in social research – the theory of rational action (based on the theory of subjective expected utility) by Esser (1974, 1984, 1986, 1990) – explain the unit
Using an experimental design, the theoretically relevant expectations, evaluations and attitudes toward scientific surveys has been collected. The sample contains about 300 students at the University of Berne (classroom survey; random selection of courses). At the end of the questionnaire, students were asked to provide their e
Students of the first experimental group received the questionnaire combined with a bar of chocolate (here: one 50g Toblerone). Students of the second experimental group were offered the chance to participate in a lottery (here: 2 x 2000g Toblerone). While the use of prepaid non
Conference homepage (abstract)
Web survey bibliography (317)
- Overview: Online Surveys; 2017; Vehovar, V.; Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Respondent mode choice in a smartphone survey ; 2017; Conrad, F. G., Schober, M. F., Antoun, C., Yan, H. Y., Hupp, A., Johnston, M., Ehlen, P., Vickers, L...
- Collecting Data from mHealth Users via SMS Surveys: A Case Study in Kenya; 2016; Johnson, D.
- Electronic and paper based data collection methods in library and information science research: A comparative...; 2016; Tella, A.
- Stable Relationships, Stable Participation? The Effects of Partnership Dissolution and Changes in Relationship...; 2016; Mueller, B.; Castiglioni, L.
- Identifying Pertinent Variables for Nonresponse Follow-Up Surveys. Lessons Learned from 4 Cases in Switzerland...; 2016; Vandenplas, C.; Joye, D.; Staehli, M. E.; Pollien, A.
- The 2013 Census Test: Piloting Methods to Reduce 2020 Census Costs; 2016; Walejko, G. K.; Miller, P. V.
- The Validity of Surveys: Online and Offline; 2016; Wiersma, W.
- Methods can matter: Where Web surveys produce different results than phone interviews; 2016; Keeter, S.
- Do Polls Still Work If People Don't Answer Their Phones?; 2016; Edwards-Levy, A.; Jackson, N. M.
- HUFFPOLLSTER: Why Reaching Latinos Is A Challenge For Pollsters; 2016; Jackson, N. M.; Edwards-Levy, A.; Velencia, J.
- Comprehension and engagement in survey interviews with virtual agents; 2016; Conrad, F. G.; Schober, M. F.; Jans, M.; Orlowski, R. A.; Nielsen, D.; Levenstein, R. M.
- An Overview of Mobile CATI Issues in Europe; 2015; Slavec, A.; Toninelli, D.
- Using Mobile Phones for High-Frequency Data Collection; 2015; Azevedo, J. P.; Ballivian, A.; Durbin, W.
- Mixed mode surveys ; 2015; Burton, J.
- Two Are Better Than One: The Use of a Mixed-Mode Data Collection to Improve the Electoral Forecast; 2014; de Rada, V. D., Pasadas del Amo, S.
- The impact of contact effort on mode-specific selection and measurement bias; 2014; Schouten, B., van der Laan, J., Cobben, F.
- How much is shorter CAWI questionnaire VS CATI questionnaire?; 2014; Bartoli, B.
- Advantages of a global multimodal print & digital readership survey; 2013; Cour, N., Saint-Joanis, G.
- Relative Mode Effects on Data Quality in Mixed-Mode Surveys by an Instrumental Variable; 2013; Vannieuwenhuyze, J. T. A., Revilla, M.
- A report on the Confirmit Market Research Software Survey 2013; 2013; Macer, T., Wilson, S.
- Mode effect analysis and adjustment in a split-sample mixed-mode Web/CATI survey; 2013; Kolenikov, S., Kennedy, C.
- Evaluating the left‐right dimension: Category Selection Probing conducted in an online access...; 2013; Huefken , V.
- Methodological, legal and technical perspectives on the feasibility of web survey paradata in German...; 2013; Sattelberger, S.
- Impact of mode design on reliability in longitudinal data; 2013; Cernat, A.
- Exploring patterns of academic usage: A Google Scholar based study of ESS, EVS, WVS and ISSP academic...; 2013; Malnar, B.
- Web questionnaires in official population surveys: Do's and don'ts First experiments and impacts...; 2013; Blanke, K.
- Mode effects in Labour Force Surveys - do they really matter?; 2013; Koerner, T.
- Measuring the same concepts in several modes in the "BIBB/BAuA-Employee-Survey 2011/12" ; 2013; Gensicke, M., Tschersich, N., Hartmann, J.
- What works? Getting the General Population To Go Online in a Mixed Mode Local Health Survey; 2013; Frigault, L.-R., Azzou, S. A. K., Molloy, E. J. K., Ammarguellat, F., Couture, M., Gratton, J.
- Using Technology to Conduct Questionnaire Evaluations with Hard to Reach Populations ; 2013; Ridolfo, H., Ott, K.
- Mode Effects in a National Establishment Survey; 2013; Daley, K., Phillips, B. T.
- Evaluating the Effect of a Non-Monetary Incentive in a Nationally Representative Mixed-Mode Establishment...; 2013; Sengupta, M., Harris-Kojetin, L., Hobbs, M., Greene, A.
- Survey Reminder Method Experiment: An Examination of Cost Efficiency and Reminder Mode Salience in the...; 2013; Anderson, M., Rogers, B., CyBulski, K., Hall, J. W., Alderks, C. E., Milazzo-Sayre, L.
- Experiences from a probability-based Internet panel: Sample, recruitment and participation; 2013; Scherpenzeel, A.
- An Evaluation of Internet Versus Paper-based Methods for Public Participation Geographic Information...; 2012; Pocewicz, A.; Nielsen-Pincus, M.; Brown, G.; Schnitzer, R.
- Using paradata to explore item-level response times in surveys; 2012; Couper, M. P., Kreuter, F.
- Specialized Tools for Measuring Past Events ; 2012; Belli, R. F.
- Modes of Data Collection; 2012; Tourangeau, R.
- Mode and non-response effects and their treatment; 2012; Chrysanthopoulos, S., Georgostathi, A.
- “I think I know what you did last summer” Improving data quality in panel surveys; 2012; Lugtig, P. J.
- Using Text-to-Speech (TTS) for Audio-CASI; 2012; Couper, M. P., Kirgis, N., Buageila, S., Berglund, P.
- Does Mode Matter? Initial Evidence from the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES); 2012; Blumenstiel, J. E., Rossmann, J.
- The Representativity of Web Surveys of the General Population compared to Traditional Modes and Mixed...; 2012; Klausch, L. T., Schouten, B., Hox, J.
- Effects of speeding on satisficing in Mixed-Mode Surveys; 2011; Bathelt, S., Bauknecht, J.
- Web based CATI on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud and VirtualBox using queXS; 2011; Zammit, A.
- Web/Cloud Based CATI Using queXS; 2011; Zammit, A.
- When Referring to Mode, Is Expressed Preference the Same as Reality?; 2011; Denk, K.
- Three Era's of Survey Research; 2011; Groves, R. M.
- Testing a single mode vs a mixed mode design; 2011; Laaksonen, S.